A Framework for Defect Root-Cause Analysis in Cross-Functional Enterprise QA Teams
Main Article Content
Abstract
Defect root-cause analysis is an important software quality assurance activity used to identify the underlying reasons behind defects rather than focusing only on their immediate symptoms. In large enterprise software environments, defects may originate from multiple areas, including unclear requirements, design decisions, coding errors, integration problems, test-data issues, environment configuration, or gaps in testing processes. The involvement of cross-functional teams makes root-cause analysis more comprehensive but can also introduce challenges related to communication, ownership, technical dependencies, and differences in team perspectives. This study proposes a structured framework for performing defect root-cause analysis within cross-functional enterprise Quality Assurance (QA) teams. The framework focuses on systematic defect classification, evidence collection, impact assessment, identification of contributing factors, root-cause determination, corrective actions, and preventive measures. It also emphasizes collaboration among QA engineers, developers, business analysts, architects, operations teams, and other relevant stakeholders. The proposed approach aims to move organizations from reactive defect fixing toward proactive quality improvement by identifying recurring patterns and addressing weaknesses in development and testing processes. The study highlights the importance of standardized analysis techniques, clear responsibilities, reliable defect data, effective communication, and continuous monitoring. A structured root-cause analysis framework can help enterprise QA teams reduce recurring defects, improve development and testing processes, and strengthen overall software quality
Article Details
References
1. Pressman, R. S., and Maxim, B. R., Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, McGraw-Hill Education.
2. Sommerville, I., Software Engineering, Pearson.
3. Kan, S. H., Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering, Addison-Wesley.
4. Juran, J. M., and Godfrey, A. B., Juran's Quality Handbook, McGraw-Hill.
5. Ishikawa, K., Guide to Quality Control, Asian Productivity Organization.
6. Andersen, B., and Fagerhaug, T., Root Cause Analysis: Simplified Tools and Techniques, ASQ Quality Press.
7. IEEE Computer Society, Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK), IEEE.
8. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems – Requirements, ISO.
9. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119 Software Testing, ISO/IEC/IEEE.
10. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission, ISO/IEC 25010 Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE), ISO/IEC.
11. Deming, W. E., Out of the Crisis, MIT Press.
12. Humble, J., and Farley, D., Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation, Addison-Wesley.
13. Duvall, P. M., Matyas, S. M., and Glover, A., Continuous Integration: Improving Software Quality and Reducing Risk, Addison-Wesley.
14. Montgomery, D. C., Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, Wiley.
15. Pressman, R. S., Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, McGraw-Hill, for concepts related to software quality, defect management, testing, and process improvement