Data Quality Assurance in Statewide Longitudinal Education Data Systems: A CALPADS Case Study

Authors

  • Samanuru Geetha Chakravarthy

Abstract

Statewide Longitudinal Education Data Systems (SLDS) play an important role in collecting, integrating, and maintaining education data across multiple academic years and institutions. This case study examines data quality assurance practices in the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS), with particular emphasis on data accuracy, completeness, consistency, validity, and timeliness. The study explores the challenges associated with collecting data from diverse educational institutions and integrating information across different systems, reporting periods, and student records. It also examines quality assurance techniques such as automated validation rules, data reconciliation, error detection, standardized reporting procedures, and continuous monitoring. Particular attention is given to the role of data governance and systematic quality checks in identifying and reducing inaccurate or incomplete records. The case study demonstrates how a structured data quality assurance framework can improve the reliability and usability of longitudinal education data for reporting, accountability, research, and educational planning. The findings highlight the importance of combining automated validation with well-defined data standards, stakeholder coordination, and continuous quality improvement to maintain trustworthy statewide education information.

References

1. California Department of Education. (2019). California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS): Statewide student identifier (SSID) and enrollment procedures. California Department of Education.

2. California Department of Education. (2020). CALPADS data guide. California Department of Education.

3. California Department of Education. (2021). California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) file specifications. California Department of Education.

4. California Department of Education. (2021). CALPADS system documentation and error list. California Department of Education.

5. California Department of Education. (2021). California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) user manual. California Department of Education.

6. Institute of Education Sciences. (2009). Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems: Grant program. U.S. Department of Education.

7. National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Statewide longitudinal data systems: Grant program. U.S. Department of Education.

8. National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Statewide longitudinal data systems survey analysis. U.S. Department of Education.

9. Bloom-Weltman, J. (2019). Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) survey analysis. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

10. Data Quality Campaign. (2019). Data quality campaign annual report: Using data to improve student outcomes. Data Quality Campaign.

11. Data Quality Campaign. (2020). The state of data in education: Building a culture of data use. Data Quality Campaign.

12. Education Commission of the States. (2018). Statewide longitudinal data systems: 50-state comparison. Education Commission of the States.

13. Forum Guide to Education Data. (2012). Forum guide to data quality: The practices and processes for data quality. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

14. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2006). Forum guide to building a culture of quality data: A school & district resource. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

15. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2010). Forum guide to statewide longitudinal data systems. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

16. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2013). Forum guide to the privacy of student information: A resource for schools. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

17. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2018). Forum guide to education data governance. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

18. U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) grant program: Program requirements and priorities. U.S. Department of Education.

19. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan update. U.S. Department of Education.

20. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Education data: Improved collection and reporting could enhance education research and policymaking. U.S. Government Accountability Office.

21. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2019). California Department of Education: Statewide longitudinal education data and data reliability. U.S. Government Accountability Office.

22. Redman, T. C. (1996). Data quality for the information age. Artech House.

23. Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099

24. Kahn, B. K., Strong, D. M., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). Information quality benchmarks: Product and service performance. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.506007

25. Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.506010

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Chakravarthy, S. G. (2022). Data Quality Assurance in Statewide Longitudinal Education Data Systems: A CALPADS Case Study. Australian Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Innovation , 4(4). Retrieved from https://journals.theusinsight.com/index.php/AJCDI/article/view/189

Issue

Section

Articles